Management strategy and research productivity in the Peruvian Institute of Nuclear Energy for the period 2000 – 2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21754/iecos.v25i1.1955Keywords:
research productivity, management, nuclear plants, policiesAbstract
This paper analyzes the production indicators for the period 2000-2020 of the Peruvian Institute of Nuclear Energy, an institution that researches and applies knowledge of ionizing radiation. The research institute published an average of one article per year between 1984 and 2000. During the period 2001 to 2006, some policies were applied. Staff salaries were tripled, allowing the incorporation of researchers with experience in scientific research. The number of publications increased from 01 in 2001 to 15 in 2007 as a result of intense work done in 2006. These policies were ignored in 2007 with a significant change in research productivity in years to come. Finally, an overall analysis determines that: (a) management actions are different from manager director to manager director and the changes substantially affect research productivity, (b) the policy that increases researcher salary may be more detrimental than reducing the total annual budget for research since by increasing the researcher salary is still possible to preserve research indicator trends.
Downloads
References
Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2015). Evaluating university research: Same performance indicator, different rankings. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 514-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.04.002
Bala, A., & Kumari, S. (2013). Research Performance of National Institutes of Technology (NITS) of India During 2001-2010: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Information and Knowledge, 50(5), 555–572. https://www.srels.org/index.php/sjim/article/view/43774
Coccia, M. (2004). New models for measuring the R&D performance and identifying the productivity of public research institutes. R&D Management, 34(3), 267-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00338.x
Coccia, M. (2005). A scientometric model for the assessment of scientific research performance within public institutes. Scientometrics, 65(3), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0276-1
Dhawan, S. M., & Gupta, B. M. (2007). Physics research in India: A study of institutional performance based on publications output. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 27(1), 55-67. https://publications.drdo.gov.in/ojs/index.php/djlit/article/view/123
Jeevan, V. K. J., & Sen, B. K. (2007). A scientometric analysis of publications on accelerator-based research from nuclear science centre and Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, India. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 12(2), 89-97. https://mjs.um.edu.my/index.php/MJLIS/article/view/6998
Jeyshankar, R. (2015). Research productivity of the scientists of indira gandhi centre for atomic research (IGCAR) kalpakkam (chennai): A Scientometric Analysis. Library Philosophy and Practice, 0_1,1-16. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1781733301?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
Kademani, B. S., Kumar, V., Surwase, G., Sagar, A., Mohan, L., Gaderao, C. R., Kumar, A., Kalyane, V. L., & Prakasan, E. R. (2005). Scientometric dimensions of innovation communication productivity of the Chemistry Division at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 10(1), 65–89. https://vmis.um.edu.my/index.php/MJLIS/article/view/8479
Kumar, S., & Kumar, S. (2004). Productometric study of scientists of ICAR'S National Research Centre for Soybean (NRCS). Annals of library and information studies, 51(1),11-21. http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/7676
Mondal, D., & Raychoudhury, N. (2018). Research productivity of Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics (SINP), India with special reference to international collaborative experimental consortia. Libr. Philos. Pract, 1-15. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1863
Montoya, M. (2006). Optimización del Sistema Peruano de Ciencia y Tecnología. Fondo Editorial UNMSM.
Montoya, M. (2011). Políticas para impulsar la ciencia, la tecnología y la innovación tecnológica en el Perú. Fondo Editorial UNMSM.
Neves, P. C., Afonso, O., Silva, D., & Sochirca, E. (2021). The link between intellectual property rights, innovation, and growth: A meta-analysis. Economic Modelling, 97, 196-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.01.019
Pal, J. & Sarkar, S. (2020). Evaluation of Institutional Research Productivity. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 40(1), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.40.01.14804
Rijcke, S. D., Wouters, P. F., Rushforth, A. D., Franssen, T. P., & Hammarfelt, B. (2016). Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review. Research evaluation, 25(2), 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv038
Surwase, G., Kademani, B. S., & Kumar, V. (2008). Scientometric dimensions of neutron scattering research in India. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 28(3), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.28.3.173
Upadhye, R. P., Kademani, B. S., Surwase, G., & Kumar, V. (2010). Scientometric dimensions of the nuclear physics division at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 47(4), 437-448. https://www.srels.org/index.php/sjim/article/view/44969
Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of informetrics, 10(2), 365-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007
Van Raan, A. (1999) Advanced bibliometric methods for the evaluation of universities. Scientometrics, 45(3), 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457601
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Modesto Edilberto Montoya Zavaleta, Edgardo Martin Figueroa Donayre, Jose Luis Mantari Laureano
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CC BY 4.0 DEED Attribution 4.0 International
