Management strategy and research productivity in the Peruvian Institute of Nuclear Energy for the period 2000 – 2020

Authors

  • Modesto Edilberto Montoya Zavaleta Peruvian Institute of Nuclear Energy, Lima, Peru
  • Edgardo Martin Figueroa Donayre National University of Juliaca, Puno, Peru
  • Jose Luis Mantari Laureano Department of Sciences, University of Engineering and Technology, Lima, Peru

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21754/iecos.v25i1.1955

Keywords:

research productivity, management, nuclear plants, policies

Abstract

This paper analyzes the production indicators for the period 2000-2020 of the Peruvian Institute of Nuclear Energy, an institution that researches and applies knowledge of ionizing radiation. The research institute published an average of one article per year between 1984 and 2000. During the period 2001 to 2006, some policies were applied. Staff salaries were tripled, allowing the incorporation of researchers with experience in scientific research. The number of publications increased from 01 in 2001 to 15 in 2007 as a result of intense work done in 2006. These policies were ignored in 2007 with a significant change in research productivity in years to come. Finally, an overall analysis determines that: (a) management actions are different from manager director to manager director and the changes substantially affect research productivity, (b) the policy that increases researcher salary may be more detrimental than reducing the total annual budget for research since by increasing the researcher salary is still possible to preserve research indicator trends.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2015). Evaluating university research: Same performance indicator, different rankings. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 514-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.04.002

Bala, A., & Kumari, S. (2013). Research Performance of National Institutes of Technology (NITS) of India During 2001-2010: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Information and Knowledge, 50(5), 555–572. https://www.srels.org/index.php/sjim/article/view/43774

Coccia, M. (2004). New models for measuring the R&D performance and identifying the productivity of public research institutes. R&D Management, 34(3), 267-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00338.x

Coccia, M. (2005). A scientometric model for the assessment of scientific research performance within public institutes. Scientometrics, 65(3), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0276-1

Dhawan, S. M., & Gupta, B. M. (2007). Physics research in India: A study of institutional performance based on publications output. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 27(1), 55-67. https://publications.drdo.gov.in/ojs/index.php/djlit/article/view/123

Jeevan, V. K. J., & Sen, B. K. (2007). A scientometric analysis of publications on accelerator-based research from nuclear science centre and Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, India. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 12(2), 89-97. https://mjs.um.edu.my/index.php/MJLIS/article/view/6998

Jeyshankar, R. (2015). Research productivity of the scientists of indira gandhi centre for atomic research (IGCAR) kalpakkam (chennai): A Scientometric Analysis. Library Philosophy and Practice, 0_1,1-16. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1781733301?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true

Kademani, B. S., Kumar, V., Surwase, G., Sagar, A., Mohan, L., Gaderao, C. R., Kumar, A., Kalyane, V. L., & Prakasan, E. R. (2005). Scientometric dimensions of innovation communication productivity of the Chemistry Division at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 10(1), 65–89. https://vmis.um.edu.my/index.php/MJLIS/article/view/8479

Kumar, S., & Kumar, S. (2004). Productometric study of scientists of ICAR'S National Research Centre for Soybean (NRCS). Annals of library and information studies, 51(1),11-21. http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/7676

Mondal, D., & Raychoudhury, N. (2018). Research productivity of Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics (SINP), India with special reference to international collaborative experimental consortia. Libr. Philos. Pract, 1-15. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1863

Montoya, M. (2006). Optimización del Sistema Peruano de Ciencia y Tecnología. Fondo Editorial UNMSM.

Montoya, M. (2011). Políticas para impulsar la ciencia, la tecnología y la innovación tecnológica en el Perú. Fondo Editorial UNMSM.

Neves, P. C., Afonso, O., Silva, D., & Sochirca, E. (2021). The link between intellectual property rights, innovation, and growth: A meta-analysis. Economic Modelling, 97, 196-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.01.019

Pal, J. & Sarkar, S. (2020). Evaluation of Institutional Research Productivity. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 40(1), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.40.01.14804

Rijcke, S. D., Wouters, P. F., Rushforth, A. D., Franssen, T. P., & Hammarfelt, B. (2016). Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review. Research evaluation, 25(2), 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv038

Surwase, G., Kademani, B. S., & Kumar, V. (2008). Scientometric dimensions of neutron scattering research in India. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 28(3), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.28.3.173

Upadhye, R. P., Kademani, B. S., Surwase, G., & Kumar, V. (2010). Scientometric dimensions of the nuclear physics division at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 47(4), 437-448. https://www.srels.org/index.php/sjim/article/view/44969

Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of informetrics, 10(2), 365-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007

Van Raan, A. (1999) Advanced bibliometric methods for the evaluation of universities. Scientometrics, 45(3), 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457601

Published

2024-03-24

How to Cite

Montoya Zavaleta, M. E., Figueroa Donayre, E. M., & Mantari Laureano, J. L. (2024). Management strategy and research productivity in the Peruvian Institute of Nuclear Energy for the period 2000 – 2020. Revista IECOS, 25(1), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.21754/iecos.v25i1.1955

Issue

Section

Case stady

Most read articles by the same author(s)