Disruptive strategic innovation plan for a university using "The house of quality"

Authors

  • Edgardo Martin Figueroa Donayre National University of Juliaca, Juliaca, Puno, Peru
  • José Luis Mantari Laureano Department of Sciences, University of Engineering and Technology, Lima, Peru
  • Edgard Loayza Cuadra D+Imac Lab SAC, Engineering Projects, Lima, Peru
  • Julio Zubilete Rivera Technological University of the Andes, Apurimac, Peru
  • Francisco Medina Raya Technological University of the Andes, Apurimac, Peru
  • María Eugenia Morales Grados National University of Engineering, Lima, Peru

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21754/iecos.v24i2.1954

Keywords:

Logical Framework, QFD, Disruptive Innovation, process, Enterprise

Abstract

A strategic plan for innovation is an essential tool for any academic institution. This disruptive strategic plan for innovation maximizes the value and benefits for public and private institutions using the logical framework and the house of quality. With the logical framework of action, the input data for planning is clear, the rest of the activities of the house of quality (product design, process design and process control) are direct. The house of quality is the most effective technique to understand and even quantify the value of proposals. In addition, applied to a university, it ensures the obtaining of funds (money) that support and promote the development of innovation by prioritizing the voice of the customer (Innovate).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldunate, E., & Córdoba, J. (2011). Formulación de programas con la metodología de marco lógico. CEPAL, 68. https://hdl.handle.net/11362/5507

Arboleada Valencia, L. M. & Perdomo Cruz, S. (2019). Proyecto de Despliegue de la Función Calidad Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Aplicada a una crema de manos. Universidad Santiago de Cali.

Baron, R. A., & Shane, S. (2007). Entrepreneurship: A process perspective. The psychology of entrepreneurship, 19-39.

Chen, C. L., & Bullington, S. F. (1993). Development of a strategic research plan for an academic department through the use of quality function deployment. Computers & industrial engineering, 25(1-4), 49-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-8352(93)90218-M

Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., & Martinez, L. (2019). Balanced scorecard-based Analysis about European Energy Investment Policies: A hybrid hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach with Quality Function Deployment. Expert Systems with Applications, 115, 152-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.07.072

Duhovnik, J., Kušar, J., Tomaževič, R., & Starbek, M. (2006). Development process with regard to customer requirements. Concurrent Engineering, 14(1), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X06064149

Gunasekaran, A., Subramanian, N., & Ngai, W. T. E. (2019). Quality management in the 21st century enterprises: Research pathway towards Industry 4.0. International journal of production economics, 207, 125-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.005

Habib, T., Ghani, U., Hayat, M., & Noor, I. (2021). Process improvement by applying quality function deployment in a locomotive manufacturing. Academic Journal of Manufacturing Engineering, 19(4). https://www.ajme.ro/PDF_AJME_2021_4/L13.pdf

Hunt, R. A., & Xavier, F. B. (2003). The leading edge in strategic QFD. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(1), 56-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710310453818

Innóvate Perú. (2021). Innóvate Perú. Recuperado de https://www.proinnovate.gob.pe/32-innovate-peru

Lu-Chang-Say, J., Lu-Chang-Say, E., Zuloaga-Rotta, L., & Zarate-Otarola, B. (2018). DNA Lean Philosophy and TOC for Develop, Innovate and Improve Processes. EasyChair, (266). https://doi.org/10.29007/133k

Parmenter, D. (2015). Key performance indicators: developing, implementing, and using winning KPIs. John Wiley & Sons.

Resolución de Consejo Universitario Nº 0509-2017-UTEA-CU de 2017 [Universidad Tecnológica de los Andes]. Aprobación, El Instructivo General sobre Investigación Pregrado y Postgrado, que es una herramienta pedagógica normativa y orientadora para los alumnos de pre grado y post grado y docentes investigadores, permitiendo realizar en forma eficientes, eficaz el proceso de investigación en la Universidad Tecnológica de los Andes. 17 de mayo del 2017.

http://portal.utea.edu.pe/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Resolucion-N%C2%B0-0509-2017-Instructivo-general-sobre-investigacion-pregrado-y-posgrado.pdf

Rianmora, S., & Werawatganon, S. (2021). Applying quality function deployment in open innovation engineering. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010026

Tang, Y., Wei, J., Xin, Y., & Mou, X. (2022). Curriculum design for vocational industrial robotics: the quality function deployment (QFD) approach used in China for vocational course design. SN Social Sciences, 2(5), 64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00366-z

Vela Meléndez, L., Acevedo Sánchez, E. R., Yesquen Zapata, P., & Venturra Carrillo, G. (2018). Ciencia, tecnología e innovación en el Perú. Necesidad de una política pública descentralista, que institucionaliza las alianzas Academia-Empresa-Estado y Sociedad Civil. GeoGraphos, 9(106), p. 138-157. https://doi.org/10.14198/GEOGRA2018.9.106

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

Figueroa Donayre, E. M., Mantari Laureano, J. L., Loayza Cuadra, E., Zubilete Rivera, J., Medina Raya, F., & Morales Grados, M. E. (2023). Disruptive strategic innovation plan for a university using "The house of quality". Revista IECOS, 24(2), 160–179. https://doi.org/10.21754/iecos.v24i2.1954

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)