Building of a radioactive two‐phase mixing prototype for the evaluation of extrinsic correction maps in spect gamma cameras

Authors

  • María Velásquez Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Av. Angamos Este 2520, Surquillo.
  • Irla Mantilla Laboratorio de Simulación e Investigación Numérica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería, Lima, Perú.
  • Josep Martí Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, España.
  • Alex Pachas Facultad de Ingenieria Mecanica, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Peru, Lima, Peru.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21754/tecnia.v27i2.169

Keywords:

equipment SPECT, size of pixel, center of rotation, tomographic uniformity, total evaluation of system

Abstract

Proper operation of the hardware and software of a SPECT Gamma Camera depends on its correct configuration and quality control. These are essential to obtain clinically valid images. In spite of the fact that these are recommended by the equipment manufacturer, these operations are not described in the manuals. The objective of the present work is to propose a unique method for the extrinsic quality control of any SPECT Gamma Camera manufactured to NEMA – IEC specifications. For this purpose, an automatic mixing module has been built to prepare uniform field phantoms, so as to carry out the quality control of the SPECT equipment. The module consists of an automatic mixer and a dummy (phantom). Thanks to the homogeneity of two‐ phase mixtures, we can obtain extrinsic correction maps which will serve to evaluate the quality of the equipment. This operation depends upon the homogeneity of the mixture and its optimal distribution in the phantom and in precise quantities, such as: sodium chloride 0.9% (3.5 liters) and sodium pertechnetate Tc 99m (?20mCi) from 0.1 to 0.4 ml. Radiation exposure must also be considered while preparing the mixture and trying to obtain an adequate dilution of a small amount of Tc‐99m in the volume of distilled water contained in the dummy in the shortest possible time. Analysis of the performance of the mixing module has been a very important research work. This depends upon an appropriate design of the mixing system: geometry of the impeller, mathematical modelling of the mixture, measurement of concentrations, various tests (geometry of the container, volume, diameter), speed and power of the motor, shape of the mixing blades (angle and number), all being important components to reach our objectives. The efficiency of the two‐phase mixture has been demonstrated when the SPECT Gamma Camera currently used by the INEN Nuclear Medicine Center obtained images of optimal quality.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] BOE, REAL DECRETO 1841/05/12/1997, Criterios de calidad en medicina nuclear, Publicado 19/12/(1997).

[2] EANM Physics Committee. Routine Quality Control Recommendations for Nuclear Medicine Instrumentation, Eur Journal Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37: pp. 662-671 (2010).

[3] IAEA. Quality Assurance for SPECT Systems, Human Health Edit. Series, Viena (2009).

[4] Strand S-E, Larsson 1: Image artifacts at high photon fluence rates in single-crystal Nal (TI) scintillation cameras. J Nucl Med 19: 407-413, (1978).

[5] Mantilla Núñez, Irla, S. De Vicente C. "SD Numerical Simulation Technique for Hydrodynamic Flow Gas Solids Mixing" pp:1-6, ISBN: 181015- Proceedings - Conference COMSOL, Boston - USA (2013).

[6] National Electrical Manufacturers Association- NEMA and International Electrotechnical. Commission- IEC. Performance Measurements of Scintillation Cameras, and ISO rules Standards. Publication Nº1 USA (2010).

[7] Kleinstreuer C. Modem Fluid Dynamics, Springer, ISBN 978-1-4020-8670-0.(2010).

[8] Holland, F.A. and Chapman, F.S. Liquid Mixing and Processing in stirred tanks. Reinhold Publishing Corporation, First edition, (1966).

[9] International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Recomendaciones de la Comisión Internacional de Protección Radiológica. Publicación N° 103. Madrid (2007).

[10] Oficina Técnica de la Autoridad Nacional (OTAN), Norma Técnica IR.002, Requisitos de Protección Radiológica y Seguridad en Medicina Nuclear (2012).

[11] Cherry S., Sorenson J., Phelps M. Physics in Nuclear Medicine. Saunders Elsevier. Four edition (2012).

[12] International Atomic Energy Agency (2009). Quality Assurance for SPECT Systems. IAEA Human Health Series 6: 1-112. Organismo Internacional de Energía Atómica (1991).

[13] International Agency Energy Atomic - IAEA-TECDOC-602/S: 30. Control de Calidad de los Instrumentos de Medicina Nuclear. (1997).

[14] Perry, R.H., Green, D.W., Manual del Ingeniero Químico, Mexico, Editorial McGraw-Hill, 6ta. edition, pp. 19-6 a 19-10. (1992).

[15] Brucato, S., Ciofalo, M., Grisafi, F. and Micale, G., Numerical prediction of flow fields in baffled stirred vessels: A comparison of alternative modelling approaches. Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 53, Issue 21, pp. 3653-3684 November (1998).

[16] Hernández, Pablo Martín. Predicción de datos de diseño en reactores provistos de turbina de flujo axial mediante CFD. Departament d'Enginyeria Química, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. 2007.

[17] Manual de Ansys Fluid S. Sarkar and L Balakrishnan. "Application of a Reynolds - Stress Turbulence Model to the Compressible Shear Layer". ICASE Report 90-18 NASA CR 182002. (1990).

Published

2017-12-01

How to Cite

[1]
M. Velásquez, I. Mantilla, J. Martí, and A. Pachas, “Building of a radioactive two‐phase mixing prototype for the evaluation of extrinsic correction maps in spect gamma cameras”, TECNIA, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 7–17, Dec. 2017.

Issue

Section

Articles