Allocation of Losses and Costs of the Transmission System within a Unregulated Environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21754/tecnia.v30i2.775Keywords:
Complex losses allocation, cost allocation, Circuit theory, Aumann-Shapley method, cross-effect between active and reactive powerAbstract
The electric transmission system is the infrastructure that allows the transfer of energy from the production points to the consumption centers. It has the characteristic of regulated natural monopoly. For efficiency and economic equity in the electricity market, it is necessary that both the electrical losses and the costs incurred in the transmission process be properly distributed among all the agents that make use of this system. That is why around the world a series of methodologies have been developed that allow the regulators of the electrical system to set the transmission rates that assure their owners to recover the costs incurred in the construction, operation and maintenance and allow the efficient development of the Long-term network. In this context, this article reviews the different methodologies for assigning electrical losses and transmission costs at national and international level.
Downloads
References
[2] Conejo, A. J., Arroyo, J. M., Alguacil, N., & Guijarro, A. L. (2002). Transmission Loss Allocation: A Comparison of Different Practical Algorithms. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 17(3), 571.
[3] Haque, Rezaul. Transmission loss allocation using artificial neural networks. Master thesis, University of Saskatchewan. 2006
[4] Santos Junior, Bartolomeu Ferreira dos. "Aplicação das matrizes de rede em problemas de alocação de custos, perdas e fluxos no sistema de energia elétrica.", Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Santa Catarina. 2012
[5] Bialek, J. W. Tracing the flow of electricity. IEEE Proceedings on Generation, Transmission and Distribution, v. 143, n. 4, p. 313-320, 1996.
[6] Molina, Y. P., Prada, R. B., Saavedra, O. R. (2010). Complex losses allocation to generators and loads based on circuit theory and Aumann-Shapley method. IEEE Transactionson Power Systems, 25(4), 1928-1936
[7] Rojas Rojas, Luis Felipe. Allocation of Distribution Losses among Regions. Master thesis, Universidad pontificia Comillas. Madrid, España. 2015.
[8] Conejo, A. J., Galiana, F. D., & Kockar, I. (2001). Z-bus loss allocation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 16(1), 105-110.
[9] Hsieh, Shih-Chieh. "Fair transmission loss allocation based on equivalent current injection and Shapley value." Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2006. IEEE. IEEE, 2006.
[10] Shirmohammadi, Dariush, B. Gorenstin, and Mário VP Pereira. "Some fundamental, technical concepts about cost based transmission pricing." IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 11.2 (1996): 1002-1008
[11] Aryal, S., & Karki, N. R. (2016). Evaluation of Transmission Pricing Methodologies for Nepalese Power System in Restructured Environment. In Proceedings of IOE Graduate Conference (pp. 13-17).
[12] Lima, J. M. (1996). Allocation of transmission fixed charges: an overview. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 11(3), 1409-1418.
[13] Junqueira, Max Rodrigues. "Aplicação da teoria dos jogos cooperativos para alocação dos custos de transmissão em mercados elétricos." Tese Mestre. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro (2005)
[14] Rubio-Odériz, F. J., & Perez-Arriaga, I. J. (2000). Marginal pricing of transmission services: A comparative analysis of network cost allocation methods. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 15(1), 448-454.
[15] Lima, L. M. (2007). Aprimoramento da metodologia Nodal para tarifação do uso do sistema elétrico de transmissão (Doctoral dissertation, Dissertação de Mestrado, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Elétrica, Universidade Federal de Itajubá).
[16] Molina, Yuri P., Osvaldo R. Saavedra, and Carlos Portugal. "Allocation of transmission network cost using modified Zbus matrix." International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 63 (2014): 323-330.
[17] Stamtsis, Georgios C., and István Erlich. "Use of cooperative game theory in power system fixed-cost allocation." IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution 151.3 (2004): 401-406.
[18] OSINERMING, (2015). Determinación de los porcentajes del costo anual estándar de operación y mantenimiento: Periodo mayo 2015- abril 2021. Recuperado de: http://www2.osinerg.gob.pe/Resoluciones/pdf/2015/Informe-No.0109-2015-GART.pdf
[19] OLADE. (2013). Modelos de mercado, regulación económica, y tarifas del sector eléctrico en America Latina y el Caribe-Perú. recuperado de: http://www.olade.org/wpcontent/uploads/2015/08/Informe-Final-PERU.pdf
[20] OSINERMING. (2013). Procedimiento para la asignación de responsabilidad de pago de los SST y SCT. Recuperado de: http://www.osinergmin.gob.pe/newweb/uploads/Publico/Resoluciones/ConsejoDirectivo/2008/OSINERGMIN%20No.383-2008-OS-CD.pdf
[21] Vasquez L. (10 de noviembre de 2013). Regulación-Transmision electrica-caso Perú. recuperado de: http://miblogdeenergia.blogspot.pe/2013/11/regulacion-transmision-electrica-caso.html
[22] OSINERMING. (2013). Aprovacion de la norma “Tarifas y compensaciones para Sistemas Secundarios de Transmisión y Sistemas Complementarios de Transmisión”. Recuperado de: http://www2.osinerg.gob.pe/Resoluciones/pdf/2013/OSINERGMIN%20No.217-2013-OS-CD.pdf