Seismic structural assessment of a 40 years old melt shop facility

Authors

  • Guillermo David Huaco Cardenas National University of Engineering
  • Waldo Inga Civil Engineering Faculty, National University of Engineering, Lima, Peru
  • Audry Camacho HATCH PERU, Lima, Peru.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21754/tecnia.v29i2.722

Keywords:

Melt shop, Performance base design, Bridge cranes

Abstract

Assessment of old factory infrastructure is required in order to keep them working especially after natural hazard event such as earthquake, tornados, or variation of gravity loads. This type of structure is considered essential since it should be safety for workers during operation time and to avoid possible economical losses if this facility stops its operations after any main seismic event. It is presented the structural assessment of the infrastructure of a melt shop facility, which it used for production of structural steel shapes. This infrastructure was built at the beginning of 80’s and it is located at near Pisco city in Peru. Reinforced concrete C columns and L beams make the frames of the structure and the rood is made by steel trusts. NDT and destructive tests were made for the reinforced concrete members as well of extraction of steel coupons from the roof trusts. Auscultation of foundation, reinforced concrete and steel structures were performed. It was found that several columns present damages such as spalling of cover, impact hits from heavy vehicles, which get in the interior of the facility. The roof presents metallic dust which was accumulated by the smelter operation. Heat of 50 Celsius degrees is the average temperature during the 20hours per day of operation time. Besides, capacity of several reinforced concrete columns and beams, and steel members of the roof is minor that their demands respectively according to Peru and international codes. The performance of the full structure of the melt shop including concrete and steel structures presents allowed drifts according seismic provisions, however this structure behaves on its nonlinear range under demands of Peru seismic code.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1]American Standard Test Method s, ASTM Method for Obtaining and Testing Drilled Cores and Sawed Beams of ConcreteASTM C42.

[2]American Standard Test Method s, ASTM Method for Obtaining and Testing Drilled Cores and Sawed Beams of Concrete ASTM C805.

[3]American Institute of Steel Construction, AISC Steel Construction Manual 14 th Edition

[4]American Standard Test Method s, ASTMMethod for Test Coupons for Steel Castings ASTM C1067.

[5]Peru Seismic Load Provisions 2016Norma Técnica de Estructuras, Diseño Sismoresistente NTE 030

[6]Peru Gravity and Wind Load Provisions Norma Técnica de Estructuras, Diseño Sismoresistente NTE 020

[7]American Institute of Steel Construction, AISC 360-10 Specification for Structural Steel Buildings

[8]American Institute of Steel Construction, AISC 341-10 Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings

[9]Norma Técnica de Estructuras 2009Concreto Armado NTE 060

[10]ManderJ B, PriestleyM J N and ParkR 1988Theoretical Stress-Strain Model for Confined Concrete, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 114(8)

[11]American Society of Civil Engineers –Structural Engineering Institute, ASCE41-16/SEI, Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, Reston, Virginia. EEUU

[12]Applied Technology Council 1996ATC-40, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Building, Technical Report, Redwood City, California

Published

2019-08-14

How to Cite

[1]
G. D. Huaco Cardenas, W. Inga, and A. Camacho, “Seismic structural assessment of a 40 years old melt shop facility”, TECNIA, vol. 29, no. 2, Aug. 2019.

Issue

Section

Earthquake Engineering Design and Evaluation