Evaluation of the peripheral dose for radiosurgery treatments in simulated targets in different positions of the head of a phantom

Authors

  • Cecilia Querebalú Institute of Radiosurgery of Peru. Lima Peru
  • Javier Solano Faculty of Sciences, National University of Engineering. Lima Peru
  • Fernando Márquez National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases. Lima Peru

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21754/tecnia.v28i2.343

Keywords:

radiosurgery, peripheral dose, EBT2 radiochromic films

Abstract

In radiosurgery treatments, there is always an absorbed dose (D) that is deposited outside the treatment field, this D is known as "Peripheral Dose" (PD). The objective of this work was to evaluate PD in 9 anatomical positions (eyes, thyroid, upper lungs, mediastinum, breasts and navel) of an anthropomorphic phantom. The development of the work contemplates the use of the EBT2 radiochromic films, and a photon beam of 6 MV generated in a linear accelerator Clinac 2100C / D. Analyzing the influence of collimator size, greater DP ((150.81 ± 0.97) cGy) was found in the right eye of the phantom for the collimator of 3 cm with a target fixed in the upper right plane of the head of the phantom and its influence with the distance of, a PD of (27.14 ± 1.04) cGy in the thyroid, for a target positioned in the lower left plane of the phantom head for a prescribed dose of 18 Gy. It is concluded that to carry out the optimization during the procedure in radiosurgery it is necessary to know the dependence of the PD with respect to the location of the target, the size of collimator and the distance. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1]Di BettaE, FariselliL, BergantinA, LocatelliF, Del VecchioA, BroggiS andFumagalliM 2010 Med. Phys. 37(7), 3587-3594

[2]Xu XG, Badnarz B, Paganetti L 2008 Phys. Med. Biol.53(13), 193-241

[3]Bonato C, Dias H, Alves M, Duarte L, Dias T, Dalenogare M, Viegas C, Elnecave R 2014 Radiat. Oncol.9, 40

[4]MaaroufM, TreuerH, KocherM, VogesJ, GierichA, SturmV 2005 Strahlentherapie Onkol. 181(7),463-467

[5]Brenner J et al. 2003 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.U.S.A. 100(24),13761–13766

[6]Ashland2018Recuperado de:http://www.gafchromic.com/gafchromic-film/radiotherapy-films/EBT/index.asp

[7]ICRP Publication 89 2002 Pergamon32(3-4)

[8]Webb S 1993 The Physics of Tridimensional Radiation Therapy. Conformal Radiotherapy, Radiosurgery and Treatment PlanningInstitute of Physics; London

[9]Podgorsak EB 2005 Radiation Oncology Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and StudentIAEA; Austria

[10]Arráns R et al. 2009 Rev. Fis. Med. 10,83-104

[11]Adrada A 20011 Msc. tesis, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo

[12]Williams M, Metcalfe P 2011 Radiochromic film dosimetry and its applications in radiotherapy, proceedings of Concepts and Trends in Medical Radiation DosimetryUniversity of Wolongong; Australia

[13]Seiko Epson Corporation 2018Recuperado de:https://www.epson.es/products/scanners/business-scanners/expression-11000xl

[14]Devic S, Aldelaijan S, Mohammed H, Tomic N, Liang LH, DeBlois F, Seuntjens J 2010 Med. Phys.37(5), 2208-2214

[15]Maayers S 2011 Msc. thesis, University of Wollongong

[16]Devic S, Seuntjens J, Sham E, Podgorask E, Ross C, Kirov A, Soares C 2005 Med. Phys.32(7), 2245-2253

[17]Carestream Health 2018 Recuperado de: https://www.carestream.com/es/es/medical/products/radiography/film-systems/film-solutionsfor-oncology

[18]Nieva S2013 Slide ShareRecuperado de: https://es.slideshare.net/silvianievaramos/tema-0-dca.

[19]De SaleteM, JamilH, AzevedoS 2012Radiol. Bras.45(2), 83-86Los artículos publicados por TECNIA pueden ser compartidos a través de la licencia Creative Commons: CC BY4.0 Perú. Permisos lejos de este alcance pueden ser consultados a través del correo revistas@uni.edu.pe

Published

2018-12-17

How to Cite

[1]
C. Querebalú, J. Solano, and F. Márquez, “Evaluation of the peripheral dose for radiosurgery treatments in simulated targets in different positions of the head of a phantom”, TECNIA, vol. 28, no. 2, Dec. 2018.

Issue

Section

Medical physics