Monitoring the structural health of a reinforced concrete shear wall residential building in Lima, Peru, using a raspberry shake 4d sensor

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21754/tecnia.v32i2.1412

Keywords:

Structural health monotoring, Low-cost acceleromenter, Fundamental frenquecies, Wavelet transform, Lima

Abstract

Lima, the capital of Peru, has not suffered from a great earthquake since 1746, making this a prone Mw 8.8 earthquake area according to seismological studies. In this context, seismic structural health monitoring presents an opportunity to assess rapidly buildings after a great earthquake and protect inhabitant from those buildings with high risk of collapse due to aftershocks. A basic seismic structural health monitoring arrangement of a fifteenth-floor residential building is presented using a low-cost sensor called Raspberry Shake 4D. The implemented sensor incorporates both a vertical velocity geophone and three orthogonally positioned microelectromechanical systems accelerometers. The building is a reinforced concrete shear walls structure located in Comas, north of Lima. More than thirty seismic events have been recorded, including the Mw 8.0 Lagunas earthquake (05/26/2019) and the Mw 5.8 (22/06/2021) with epicentral distances of 709 km and 94 km, respectively. Acceleration as high as 150 cm/s2 and as low as 2 cm/s2 have been recorded. It was possible to obtain fundamental frequencies of vibration in longitudinal and transversal directions of the building from the response calculated using the wavelet transform that have a good agreement with results of microtremor measurements performed at different floors. The computed scalograms for seismic records showed important values of energy amplitudes for the fundamental frequencies of the building. Finally, theoretical fundamental frequencies were obtained from a 3D finite element model and an elastic analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] L. Dorbath, A. Cisternas and C. Dorbath, “Assesment of the size of large and great historical earthquakes in Peru”, Bull. Seismol. SoC. Am., 80(3), 551-576, 1990.
[2] J.C. Villegas-Lanza, J. C., M. Chlieh, O. Cavalié, H. Tavera, P. Baby, J. Chire-Chira and J.-M. Nocquet, “Active tectonics of Peru: Heterogeneous interseismic coupling along the Nazca megathrust, rigid motion of the Peruvian Sliver, and Subandean shortening accommodation”, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 121, 2016.
[3] CAPECO, “Estudio del Mercado de Edificaciones en Lima Metropolitana”, Lima, 2020.
[4] CAPECO, “Informe Económico de la Construcción Nº 40”, Lima, 2021.
[5] M. Steinbuch and MJG Van de Molengraft, “Wavelet Theory and Applications”, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2005.
[6] Dziewonski, A., Bloch, S., and Landisman, M., 1969, A technique for the analysis of transient seismic signals, Bulletin of seismological society of America, Vol. 59, No. 1, 427-444.
[7] Mathworks, “Wavelet Toolbox User’s Guide”, 2009.
[8] P.S. Addison, The Illustrated Wavelet Transform Handbook – Introductory Theory and Applications in Science, Engineering, Medicine and Finance, Second Edition, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia, 2017.
[9] K. Kusunoki, A. Elgamal, M. Teshigawara and JP. Conte, “Evaluation of structural condition using Wavelet transforms”, The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, 2008.
[10] L. Ligang, “Seismic Performance of an Eight-Story Steel-Reinforced Concrete Building Using Performance Curves of Building”, Graduate School of Environment Studies, Nagoya University, Japan, 2015.
[11] T. Kashima, “Dynamic Behaviour of SRC Buildings Damaged by the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake Based on Strong Motion Records”, Second European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Istambul, 2014.
[12] T. Kashima, “A Change in Dynamic Characteristics of High-Rise Buildings due to the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake”, Tenth Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering Building an Earthquake-Resilient Pacific, Sydney, 2015.
[13] Centro Peruano Japonés de Investigaciones Sísmicas y Mitigación de Desastres, “Microzonificación Sísmica del Distrito de Comas”, Lima, 2010.
[14] C. Gonzales, A. Sifuentes, F. Lázares, S. Quispe and K. Huerta, “Vs Profiles, H/V Spectra and Geotechnical Classification as Proxies of the Soil Dynamic Behavior in Lima, Peru”, The 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Sendai, 2020.

Published

2022-08-08

How to Cite

[1]
A. I. Sifuentes Jiménez, M. C. Suarez Antunez, and L. E. Estacio Flores, “Monitoring the structural health of a reinforced concrete shear wall residential building in Lima, Peru, using a raspberry shake 4d sensor”, TECNIA, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 162–170, Aug. 2022.

Issue

Section

Earthquake Engineering Design and Evaluation