Implementation of Payments for Ecosystem Services in Peru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21754/iecos.v23i1.1444Keywords:
Payment for environmental services, Implementation of environmental policiesAbstract
As in several countries in the region, Payments for Ecosystem Services were widely promoted environmental policy proposals in Peru. In 2014 a specific regulatory framework was created for it. Even though the logic was that it would impact all the economic sectors that used these services, in practice it only materialized in the public drinking water sector, specifically in the drinking water companies. The reality shows that there are still questions and pending tasks to be answered, theoretical about what negotiations can work in a certain context, generally when it was designed for private and not public, as in the Peruvian case and; practices to see its degree of replicability beyond this sector. In this context, the implementation of this type of mechanism in the Peruvian case is evaluated.
Downloads
References
Aguilar-Gómez, C.; Arteaga-Reyes, T.; Gómez-Demetrio, W.; Ávila-Akerberg, V.; y Pérez-Campuzano, E. (2020). Differentiated payments for environmental services: A review of the literature. Ecosystem Services 44, 101131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101131
Bauchet, J.; Asquith, N.; Ma, Z.; Radel, C.; Godoy, R.; Zanotti, L.; Steele, D.; Gramig, B. y Chong, A. Estrella. 2020. The practice of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) in the Tropical Andes: Evidence from program administrators. Ecosystem Services, 45, 101175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101175
Bellver-Domingo, A.; Hernández-Sancho, F.; y Molinos-Senante, M. (2016). A review of Payment for Ecosystem Services for the economic internalization of environmental externalities: A water perspective. Geoforum, 70, 115-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.02.018
Börner, J.; Baylis, K.; Corbera, E.; Ezzine-de-Blas, D.; Honey-Rosés, J.; Persson, U.; y Wunder, S. (2017). The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services. World Development, 96, 359-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.020
Bottazzi, P.; Wiik, E.; Crespo, D.; Jones, J. (2018). Payment for Environmental “Self-Service”: Exploring the Links Between Farmers’ Motivation and Additionality in a Conservation Incentive Programme in the Bolivian Andes. Ecological Economics, 150, 11-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.032
Callan, S. y Thomas, J. (2013). Environmental Economics & Management: Theory, Policy, and Applications (sexta edición). Irwin.
Capella, J. (2016). Política pública y ambiente en el Perú: la ley de mecanismos de retribución por servicios ecosistémicos y los factores que permitieron su aprobación [Tesis para optar el grado de Magíster en Ciencia Política, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/7961
Deryugina, T.; Moore, F. y Tol, R. (2020). Applications of the Coase Theorem. Working Paper Series 0820, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
Fisher, B.; Turner, R.; y Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 643-653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014
Hanley, N; Shogren, J.; y White, B. (1997). Environmental economics in theory and practice. MacMillan Press Ltd.
Holcombe, R. (1997). A theory of the theory of public goods. The Review of Austrian Economics, 10(1), 1–22.
Jones, K.; Powlen, K.; Roberts, R.; y Shinbrot, X. (2020). Participation in payments for ecosystem services programs in the Global South: A systematic review. Ecosystem Services, 45, 101159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101159
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., y Thaler, R. (1990). Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1325-1348.
Ley N° 30215 de 2014. Ley de mecanismos de retribución por servicios ecosistémicos. Diario Oficial El Peruano. Lima. 29 de junio de 2014
Ministerio del Ambiente (Minam) (2010). Compensación por servicios ecosistémicos: Principios básicos de los acuerdos de conservación de servicios ecosistémicos. Las microcuencas Mishiquiyacu, Rumiyacu y Almendra de San Martín, Perú.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Miranda, D. (2020). Análisis de los mecanismos de retribución de servicios ecosistémicos. Caso: empresas prestadoras de servicios de saneamiento [Tesis de Magister Scientiae en Economía de los Recursos Naturales y del Ambiente, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina].
Muñoz-Piña, C.; Guevara, A.; Torres, J. y Braña, J. (2008). Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico’s forests: Analysis, negotiations and results. Ecological Economics, 65; 725 – 736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.031
Quintero, M; Pareja, P. (2015). Estado de Avance y Cuellos de Botella de los Mecanismos de Retribución por Servicios Ecosistémicos Hidrológicos en Perú. Cali, Colombia: CIAT. 50 p.
Schomers, S; Matzdorf, B. (2013). Payments for ecosystem services: a review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries. Ecosystem Services, 6, 16-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.01.002
Wunder, S.; Engel, S. y Pagiola, S. (2008). Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics, 65(4), 834-852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.010
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 IECOS Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CC BY 4.0 DEED Attribution 4.0 International
