Does the message matter? Evidence on the role of reciprocity in municipal tax compliance

Authors

  • José Salinas Ortiz Facultad de Ingeniería Económica, Estadística y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería, Lima, Perú
  • Cristian Serrano Arone Facultad de Ingeniería Económica, Estadística y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería, Lima, Perú

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21754/iecos.v22i1.1415

Keywords:

Behavioral sciences, tax compliance., public policy, taxpayer, municipal taxes, tax amnesty

Abstract

This research project aims to demonstrate the efficiency of behavioral science tools on municipal tax compliance and public policy issues. Specifically, the impact of treatments carried out on taxpayers in the district of Villa María del Triunfo within a tax amnesty campaign is evaluated using the Differences in Differences model. For this, a sample of 10,000 taxpayers was provided, where the treatment group was given informational letters with messages that appealed to reciprocity, and the control group, letters with a standard message. In addition, from the treatment group, a subsample was taken to carry out a survey in which the perceptions of taxpayers about taxes and municipal management were collected to understand their motivations or barriers that influence the payment or not of taxes. their tributes. The latter was arranged with the purpose of providing greater support to the results of the experimentation. The results indicate an increase of 0.72 percentage points in the tax compliance of the treatment group with respect to the control group. Although it turns out to be a reduced impact due to the context of the pandemic and the tax culture of the district, this is equivalent to an increase of 150 percent in the tax compliance ratio, so it is relevant to continue generating evidence to design better policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Carrillo, P. E., Castro, E., & Scartascini, C. (2017). Do Rewards Work? Evidence from the Randomization of Public Works (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3103797). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3103797
Castro, E., & Scartascini, C. (2019). Imperfect Attention in Public Policy: A Field Experiment during a Tax Amnesty in Argentina. Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0001661
Castro, L., & Scartascini, C. (2013). Tax Compliance and Enforcement in the Pampas: Evidence from a Field Experiment (Working Paper IDB-WP-472). IDB Working Paper Series. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/89152
Del Carpio, L. (2014). ¿Están evadiendo mis vecinos? Un experimento de campo sobre el rol de las normas sociales en el pago del impuesto predial en el Perú. GRADE,.
DellaVigna, S. (2009). Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 315–372. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.315
Djimeu, E. W., & Houndolo, D.-G. (2016). Power calculation for causal inference in social science: Sample size and minimum detectable effect determination. 44.
Dulio Leonidas, Solórzano. (2011). La cultura tributaria, un instrumento para combatir la evasión tributaria en el Perú. 111.
ECPMPP_ES_02: Lección 4.1: Una nota metodológica. (s/f). Recuperado el 22 de julio de 2021, de https://indesvirtual.iadb.org/mod/page/view.php?id=126315&forceview=1
Gertler, Paul; Martínez, Sebastián; Rawlings, Laura B.; Premand, Patrick; Vermeersch, Christel MJ. (2016). La evaluación de impacto en la práctica: Segunda edición | Publicaciones. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/spanish/document/La-evaluaci%C3%B3n-de-impacto-en-la-pr%C3%A1ctica-Segunda-edici%C3%B3n.pdf
Ministerio de Economia y Finanzas. (2021). Análisis del Rendimiento de los Tributos 2020. https://www.mef.gob.pe/es/?option=com_content&language=es-ES&Itemid=100532&view=article&catid=174&id=6176&lang=es-ES
Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas. (2021). Resultados preliminares de evaluación del cumplimiento de la Meta 2.
Recuperado el 19 de julio de 2021, de https://www.mef.gob.pe/es/?option=com_content&language=es-ES&Itemid=102432&lang=es-ES&view=article&id=6984
Municipalidad de Villa María del Triunfo. (2021). SEPARATA ESPECIAL Ordenanza N° 306-MVMT y Acuerdo 431 MML - Norma Legal Diario Oficial El Peruano.
Recuperado el 19 de julio de 2021, de https://elperuano.pe/NormasElperuano/2020/12/31/1916443-1/1916443-1.htm
Ortega, D., & Scartascini, C. (2015). Don’t Blame the Messenger: A Field Experiment on Delivery Methods for Increasing Tax Compliance (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2729732). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2729732
Rapoport, N., Rojas Mendes, A. M., & Scartascini, C. (2020). Behavioral Insights for Foresighted Public Finance. Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0002227
Stiglitz, J. E. (2003). La economía del sector público. Antoni Bosch editor.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Penguin Books.
Urrunaga, R. (2001). Fundamentos de economía pública [Books]. Fondo Editorial, Universidad del Pacífico. https://econpapers.repec.org/bookchap/paibookup/01-07.htm

Published

2021-12-27

How to Cite

Salinas Ortiz, J., & Serrano Arone, C. (2021). Does the message matter? Evidence on the role of reciprocity in municipal tax compliance. Revista IECOS, 22(1), 79–106. https://doi.org/10.21754/iecos.v22i1.1415

Issue

Section

Research Articles